• NeuromancerM
    link
    fedilink
    -89 months ago

    That is already proven. They lied about a material fact to avoid damage to Joe.

    They did the same thing with Hillary. That is a violation of federal law.

    Luckily for them Joe one and they won’t be prosecuted but it is just one of many ethical issues we are facing as a country.

    • SatansMaggotyCumFart
      link
      79 months ago

      It is not proven.

      If James Comey did anything to sway the election why wasn’t he charged?

      Same with the laptop, there has been no charges or convictions to do with it and there has been no charges or convictions of anyone surrounding it.

      • NeuromancerM
        link
        fedilink
        -69 months ago

        Imagine that, under Joe Biden, there haven’t been any charges or convictions against his son and possibly his involvement in a scandal. Who would have guessed that? The investigation is still on-going but I suspect until we get Biden out, we won’t see much on that topic.

        Comey was fired over it by the recommendation of the AG and Deputy AG.

        • SatansMaggotyCumFart
          link
          69 months ago

          I thought you said there was proof?

          If it truly was election interference wouldn’t there be criminal charges?

          • NeuromancerM
            link
            fedilink
            -79 months ago

            Why the DOJ didn’t press charges is beyond my knowledge but it they terminated him over it.

            The second incident happened then Joe became President. The investigation is still on-going.

            • SatansMaggotyCumFart
              link
              69 months ago

              Again, you said there was proof and I can’t find any.

              Can you share some of this proof that the FBI interfered with elections?

              • NeuromancerM
                link
                fedilink
                -79 months ago

                I did. So you are fine with the FBI taking sides and spreading misinformation to influence an election. We will leave it at that because that is the only logical conclusion from your statement.

                • SatansMaggotyCumFart
                  link
                  79 months ago

                  No, you said there was proof and you can’t provide any, that’s why you want to leave this conversation.

                  Because you have no proof.

                  Trump was pretty mad at Comey when he fired him, why weren’t there any criminal charges for the election interference that you allege happened?

                  You are being dishonest again.

                  • NeuromancerM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -79 months ago

                    Because you have no proof. You are a sealion. I provided you documented proof and you say you want more proof. Doesn’t work that way.

                    I am done with the conversation because it is at an impasse. You support the FBI interfering in elections and I do not.