• NeuromancerOPM
    link
    fedilink
    -117 months ago

    The bank accepted those numbers. The bank testified as a witness for Trump. They said they did not lose money. The forms clearly stated these were made up numbers.

    Fraud typically requires a victim. This is the only fraud case I know of that there is no victim. That is the point Mr wonderful is making. We are not punishing people when all parties were fine with the deal and there is no victim.

    • @TheJims
      link
      37 months ago

      Fraud requires a crime and evidence.

    • @BigWheelPowerBrakeSlider
      link
      17 months ago

      The people of the state are the victim. While everyone else (the people) has to play by the rules, Trump chose to not play by the rules. The act alone is the unlawful activity, not the result.

      • NeuromancerOPM
        link
        fedilink
        -37 months ago

        The state isn’t damaged. The bank is would be the victim and they said they were not damaged. They reviewed the data, made adjustment and issued the loans.

        First time there has been a victimless fraud lawsuit.

        • @BigWheelPowerBrakeSlider
          link
          37 months ago

          Yeah man I see your comments all over the thread and it’s just you repeating the same talking points about an activity you seemingly are not currently comprehending.