• minnixOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38 months ago

    There is something to that though, at least in comparison with Google.

    • TWeaK
      link
      fedilink
      English
      08 months ago

      Kind of, but not really. The main difference is in the image they maintain, rather than their actual practices. Both businesses collect and maintain proprietary datasets about their customers, Google is just a little more widespread and opens its data up a little more to 3rd parties (not including governments, which they both obey).

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
        link
        English
        18 months ago

        not including governments, which they both obey

        Apple famously fought the FBI in court, refusing to unlock a user’s phone, and they won.

        • TWeaK
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28 months ago

          They fought against setting a precedent where the government can compel them to create new features at no cost to the government. They still share data with governments under court orders - and the government pays them (and Google) for the teams and resources they use to facilitate these requests.

          The lawsuit was also moot anyway, as the FBI were able to buy a zero day exploit to unlock the phone themselves.

          The NSO’s Pegasus toolkit had exploits for both Android and iOS. For Android, they used WhatsApp - a 3rd party app under Facebook’s control. For iOS, they got in via iMessages - an app Apple are responsible for. Apple being “good for privacy” is like Apple’s old claim “you don’t get viruses on a Mac”. They’re all about their image.