• NeuromancerM
          link
          fedilink
          -48 months ago

          Vox often blurred the line between news and editorial

          Vox’s Explainers provided only one side of an issue, making it seem as if the information provided is all readers need to know, when in reality, right-leaning individuals would likely include other facts or make different points about the topic, amounting to bias by omission

          It’s liberal garbage. It was also irrelevant to the conversation.

          If you notice I cite cnn often because while it’s left. It normally explores both sides.

          • SatansMaggotyCumFart
            link
            28 months ago

            amounting to bias by omission

            I think you mean lying by omission and I could argue every article ever is guilty of that.

            • NeuromancerM
              link
              fedilink
              -48 months ago

              If you’d read the article I provided, you’d see I copy and pasted it.

                • NeuromancerM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -38 months ago

                  I’m not a fan of vox. I find they skew data, they don’t represent stories well. They are overly biased and the writing is awful.

                  If you like liberal sources. Mother jones use to be excellent. I haven’t checked it out in awhile. While there is a strong bias, the writing was excellent.