@[email protected] to Microblog MemesEnglish • 1 year agoHave enough money to solve almost any social issue, but put on a weird black latex suit and beat up the mentally unstable at night instead.feddit.deimagemessage-square142fedilinkarrow-up11.3Karrow-down148
arrow-up11.25Karrow-down1imageHave enough money to solve almost any social issue, but put on a weird black latex suit and beat up the mentally unstable at night instead.feddit.de@[email protected] to Microblog MemesEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square142fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish-25•edit-21 year agoI guess Mark Cuban is the closest we get to ethical billionaire Edit you chuds didn’t really realize this was a joke? Lemmy has just continually gotten worse the more redditors it absorbs
minus-squareDr. BoblinkfedilinkEnglish89•1 year agoScratch that. Dolly Parton. Her net worth shows as much less because she keeps giving it away.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish13•1 year agoI have to say: Ratio! Dolly wins by a landslide
minus-square@FeathercrownlinkEnglish20•1 year agoDoes Taylor actually do much? I thought she just hung out being a rich person and occasionally influencing people on social issues by her presence alone rather than by explicit action?
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•1 year agoIn the continuum of “ethical billionaire” (as much as that’s possible) to “evil billionaire” she’s pretty much “neutral”.
I guess Mark Cuban is the closest we get to ethical billionaire
Edit you chuds didn’t really realize this was a joke? Lemmy has just continually gotten worse the more redditors it absorbs
In other words… there are no ethical billionaires.
Yeah that’s what I said
Taylor Swift. Fight me.
Scratch that. Dolly Parton. Her net worth shows as much less because she keeps giving it away.
I have to say:
Ratio!
Dolly wins by a landslide
Taylor squeaked by Cuban using that metric.
The upvotes have spoken 👍
Does Taylor actually do much? I thought she just hung out being a rich person and occasionally influencing people on social issues by her presence alone rather than by explicit action?
You’re correct.
In the continuum of “ethical billionaire” (as much as that’s possible) to “evil billionaire” she’s pretty much “neutral”.
Jets
Can’t melt steel beans