Deykun@kbin.social to Science@kbin.social · edit-22 年前Academic journal forced to retract peer-reviewed AI-generated paper after "rat penis" pics go viralmedia.kbin.socialimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down15
arrow-up131arrow-down1imageAcademic journal forced to retract peer-reviewed AI-generated paper after "rat penis" pics go viralmedia.kbin.socialDeykun@kbin.social to Science@kbin.social · edit-22 年前message-square15linkfedilink
minus-squarebedrooms@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前Actually, figures should be checked during the reviewing process. It’s not an excuse.
minus-squarebedrooms@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 年前No, “should be” as in, it must be reviewed but can be skipped if there’s a concern like revealing the author identity in a double-blind process.
deleted by creator
Actually, figures should be checked during the reviewing process. It’s not an excuse.
deleted by creator
No, “should be” as in, it must be reviewed but can be skipped if there’s a concern like revealing the author identity in a double-blind process.