After a short trial, a Texas judge ruled that Barbers Hill school officials are not violating a new state law prohibiting hair discrimination.


A Texas judge on Thursday said the Barbers Hill Independent School District can punish a Black student who wears his hair in long locs without violating Texas’ new CROWN Act, which is meant to prevent hairstyle discrimination in schools and workplaces.

The decision came after a monthslong dispute between the district and Darryl George, a junior at Barbers Hill High School who has been sent to in-school suspension since August for wearing his hair in long locs. Legislators last year passed a law called the Texas CROWN Act that prohibits discrimination on the basis of hair texture or protective styles associated with race. Protective styles include locs, braids and twists.

But the Barbers Hill school district successfully argued it can still enforce its policy that prohibits males from wearing hair that extends beyond eyebrows, earlobes or collars even if it’s gathered on top of the student’s head.

Judge Chap B. Cain III issued the ruling after a short trial in which lawyers for opposing sides argued over the legislative intent behind the CROWN Act. Lawyers for Barbers Hill said lawmakers would have included explicit language about hair length had they intended the law to cover it. Allie Booker, representing Darryl George and his mother Darresha George, said protective styles are only possible with long hair.

read more: https://19thnews.org/2024/02/texas-school-district-hair-discrimination-darryl-george/

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -7
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    My understanding is that he would have been allowed to have this style if his hair was long.

    Its ridiculous, but they are not forcing men to have shirt hair in this decision.

    • @GlendatheGayWitch
      link
      79 months ago

      The district suspended him and put him in ISS (in-school suspension) on the grounds that the code of conduct says that boy hair must be short. The ruling upholds the district punishing the student because his hair is long. This means that the ruling forces students to have short hair when the district mandates it.