Largest cluster of sunken vessels from the 18th and 19th centuries have been identified, bearing ‘silent witness’ to the colonial past

They were the ships that carried enslaved Africans on hellish transatlantic voyages through the 18th and 19th centuries, with up to 400 in a single vessel. Now the wrecks of 14 ships have been identified in the northern Bahamas, marking what has been described by a British marine archaeologist as a previously unknown “highway to horror”.

The fate of the African men, women and children trafficked in their holds is unknown, but if a vessel was sinking, they were often bolted below deck to allow the crew to escape.

Sean Kingsley told the Observer that this extraordinary cluster of wrecks reveals that enslavers had used the Providence Channel heading south to New Providence, Cuba and around to New Orleans in the Gulf of Mexico.

These ships, which date from between 1704 and 1887, were mostly American-flagged, and profited from Cuba’s sugar and coffee plantations, where enslaved Africans faced a life of cruelty.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    147 months ago

    I like your posts in general, but this is disingenious. The Louisiana purchase was in 1803, the American Civil War did not conclude until 1865.

    So, ‘That’s how little of a shit the South apparently gave about it’

    • Flying Squid
      link
      157 months ago

      I’m not sure what the relevance of the Louisiana Purchase or the South is here. The Louisiana purchase had nothing to do with the Slave Trade Act of 1800 and because the Civil War only began the year the ship sank, and because the article does not call it a Confederate ship, I think it’s very clear that they mean a schooner that sank in 1860 that was flying U.S. flags and was a registered U.S. merchant vessel. Meaning it was in violation of U.S. law.

      And, as the article says, U.S. ships continued to do this until 1887, long after American emancipation.

      I’m sorry, the fact is that the U.S. government didn’t give a shit about Americans engaging in the international slave trade as long as they didn’t sell those slaves within America’s borders.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        67 months ago

        I am saying two things, 1) the U.S. as we know it now did not have control of the Southern borders at the time, and 2) the article states that these ships were bound for New Orleans.

        ‘Sean Kingsley told the Observer that this extraordinary cluster of wrecks reveals that enslavers had used the Providence Channel heading south to New Providence, Cuba and around to New Orleans in the Gulf of Mexico.’

        • Flying Squid
          link
          47 months ago

          New Orleans was part of the United States until January 26, 1861 when Louisiana seceded. The ship sank in 1860.

          And, again, it was still happening in 1887. Which was 22 years after emancipation.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            27 months ago

            The U.S. was incredibly fragile after the war (arguably still is). Realpolitik won the day.

            I heard there was gold in your belly

            • Flying Squid
              link
              17 months ago

              After which war? The Revolutionary war in the 1700s? The War of 1812? The Civil War that Louisiana wasn’t a part of yet?