• @afraid_of_zombies
    link
    01 year ago

    I was referring to the short version. I only answer how many people are living here and leave the other 10 or so blank.

    If the government wants to go through the effort of court battle I obviously don’t welcome that but I acknowledge that they can. Zero interest in a fight about this. Doesn’t really matter they can get their data other ways with or without my help.

    • @Hobo
      link
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Wasn’t really looking to fight you on your personal choices. Just thought it was interesting and relevant to the post. You do you…

      • @afraid_of_zombies
        link
        51 year ago

        Sorry that is on me I came off hostile and that wasn’t my intention. Cheers.

        • @Hobo
          link
          31 year ago

          No problem. Have a good one!

    • @Yaztromo
      link
      21 year ago

      I don’t know anything about the system in the US, but I know that here in Canada they won’t take you to court instantly if you don’t fill in the census (short or long, similar to the US). Instead they’ll send you a few reminder letters first, and if that doesn’t work they’ll try to send a census working to your home to ask you the questions you missed. AFAIK, this is done to try to prevent a situation where you’re taking to court someone who perhaps can’t read (due to vision or literacy or language problems), or who has other trouble filling out the forms.

      So long as you cooperate with the census worker, you won’t see the inside of a courtroom. AFAIK they only take people to court who don’t cooperate with the census taker.