"Will this undermine most of what makes IAmA special? Probably."

… On Saturday, the r/IAmA moderators announced that they will no longer perform these duties:

Active solicitation of celebrities or high-profile figures to do AMAs. Email and modmail coordination with celebrities and high-profile figures and their PR teams to facilitate, educate, and operate AMAs. (We will still be available to answer questions about posting, though response time may vary).

Running and maintaining a website for scheduling of AMAs with pre-verification and proof, as well as social media promotion.

Maintaining a current up-to-date sidebar calendar of scheduled AMAs, with schedule reminders for users.

Sister subreddits with categorized cross-posts for easy following.

Moderator confidential verification for AMAs.

Running various bots, including automatic flairing of live posts The subreddit, which has 22.5 million subscribers as of this writing, will still exist, but its moderators contend that most of what makes it special will be undermined.

“Moving forward, we’ll be allowing most AMA topics, leaving proof and requests for verification up to the community, and limiting ourselves to removing rule-breaking material alone. This doesn’t mean we’re allowing fake AMAs explicitly, but it does mean you’ll need to pay more attention,” the moderators said.

The mods will also continue to do bare minimum tasks like keeping spam out and rule enforcement, they said. Like many other Reddit moderators Ars has spoken to, some will step away from their duties, and they’ll reportedly be replaced “as needed.” …

  • LvxferreM
    7•1 year ago

    I’ve seen another subreddit using a similar approach, r/linguistics. They simply added two new rules:

    1. All posts should be links to academic linguistics articles.
    2. All questions should go into the weekly Q&A thread.

    They’re fairly reasonable from a distance - it’s a science sub so focus on academic articles is understandable, and there’s a place to ask questions. Well… except that most content of the subreddit was rather complex questions that sparked discussion, that simply does not fit within the Q&A thread. Here’s the effect of those two new rules:

    • Jun/11 - 13 non-mod posts across the day, so 13 posts/day. Fairly typical activity.
    • from Jun/23 to Jul/3 - 4 non-mod posts across seven days, so 0.6 posts/day

    Even the c/linguistics comm that I moderate here in Lemmy is more active than that, with 1/1000 (yup) of the members.

    • Boz (he/him)
      2•1 year ago

      I love that. Decreasing the overall number of posts also decreases the number of places ads can appear in that sub, and the number of eyeballs available to see the ads, since no one is going to spend as long on a less-active sub as they would on an active one.