• Void_Reader
    link
    English
    281 year ago

    All the actual journalism getting paywalled probably isn’t great for social/political discourse and our general grip on reality.

    • Karza
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      It’s kind of ridiculous how quickly actual access to news and an informed world view, which WAS supposed to be one of the Internet’s great advantages, has become a dream unless you pony up to the whimsies of every fucking publication board craving fat profits.

      • Void_Reader
        link
        English
        51 year ago

        Yeah, plus it’s not even like having to buy newspapers in the pre-internet days, it’s all recurring subscriptions that are a pain to cancel. Truly a great shame.

        • @Strangle
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          It’s prices. You should be able to subscribe to a website for $3 a month

    • @FunkyDuck
      link
      English
      91 year ago

      It sucks because journalists do need to make money to continue reporting. Spamming sites with ads is bad for the reader’s experience too. Not totally sure what the solution is.

    • @riodoro1
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      Just wait till they paywall the air.

      Now you get that polluted city shit for free and only need to pay for access to premium country air. As time goes by we’ll all need to pay up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        On the bright side, that would come with a strong carbon tax and climate change would be much reduced.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      Everything funded by a ton of ads wouldn’t be great either. More state funding might be a solution but support for it is lackluster.