• NeuromancerOPM
    link
    fedilink
    -89 months ago

    Be civil.

    The 2nd amendment isn’t being argued. A bump stock is not an arm. Have you read anything on the case? What is being argued is if it creates a machine gun. It does not.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -99 months ago

      The prohibition of functional components of an arm is reasonably an infringement of the right to bear arms.

      • NeuromancerOPM
        link
        fedilink
        -119 months ago

        How? Do you think Scalia didn’t know what he was talking about ?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -99 months ago

          I think he’s carrying water for his political buddies that have a vested interest in restricting our rights

          • NeuromancerOPM
            link
            fedilink
            -129 months ago

            He is dead. So you think his zombie corpse has a vested interest in restricting our rights?

              • NeuromancerOPM
                link
                fedilink
                -89 months ago

                I’m not opposed to every restriction. I’m just opposed to most restrictions. The bump stock isn’t even about the 2nd. It’s about can the atf change the meanings of words. While I don’t mind the ban. The logic is bad and that’s why the ban should be overturned. It does not create a machine gun. It does not meet the requirements of the law.