@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoNintendidn't hear no bellkbin.runimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up1456arrow-down120
arrow-up1436arrow-down1imageNintendidn't hear no bellkbin.run@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squarenudny ekscentryklinkfedilink16•1 year agoI think it’s about money, just like with Vanced. Google didn’t care for the hacked YouTube client before the team behind the mod tried to make money off of it. Now Yuzu did the same and Nintendo went after them.
minus-square@ledixlink6•1 year agoTachiyoumi is a different case, they absolutely could win but didn’t have resources to go to court.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 year agoPatron that boomed with totk being leaked, but that’s hardly their issue
I think it’s about money, just like with Vanced. Google didn’t care for the hacked YouTube client before the team behind the mod tried to make money off of it. Now Yuzu did the same and Nintendo went after them.
Tachiyomi didn’t try to monetize tho, still got taken down
Tachiyoumi is a different case, they absolutely could win but didn’t have resources to go to court.
How did they try to monetize?
Patron that boomed with totk being leaked, but that’s hardly their issue
what did they do?