For my phone, I use Graphene OS. What would be the best desktop Linux option to match the level of security and privacy that GOS provides?

  • 👁️👄👁️
    link
    fedilink
    161 year ago

    Pretty much any distro that isn’t Ubuntu. Are you asking for privacy or security? Those are very different.

    For security, I’d stick to more complete distros like Fedora instead of more diy distros like NixOS or Arch. They’re great to learn and tinker with, but distros like Fedora have security experts adding mitigations and security stuff in the distro by default, whereas most users of Arch or something would have to manually look up those things and keep up to date on the latest security. So basically, none of them lol.

    Using more hardcore security distros like QubesOS is not very realistic as a daily driver. You’ll see Linux nerds name drop it and claim they know what they’re talking about, but none of them will actually dailt drive it because it’s a very painful experience. Just stick with flatpaks as much as you can for pretty solid security.

    • @gobbling871
      link
      41 year ago

      What security stuff/mitigations are added on Fedora that are not on Ubuntu?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        Ubuntu is bad privacy-wise because it has opt-out telemetry. The telemetry is not very invasive though and I wouldn’t really call it a privacy risk. There are other reasons to prefer other distros over Ubuntu though

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            You’re right. This only counts users though whereas Ubuntu collects information about your system

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            Fulfulde
            11 year ago

            Counting users based on their ip VS selling user search queries to amazon (i know it got changed to opt-in, but that’s a massive stain on their reputation as far as I’m concerned)

        • @gobbling871
          link
          11 year ago

          My question is simple: Which of these security features are not enabled/present in Ubuntu that give Fedora an advantage?

          SELinux has a functional equivalent called Apparmor that is also enabled out of the box in most distros.

          • 👁️👄👁️
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            Selinux is more secure then app armor, but more difficult to use. Ubuntu is also pretty secure, I’m just not as familiar with it. I mentioned it for the privacy but, since it used to have some Amazon bloat crapped bundled and telemetry built in.

            • @gobbling871
              link
              01 year ago

              I have nothing against your personal preferences. But maybe compare today’s Ubuntu vs Fedora. It would be a much more fair comparison.

                  • 👁️👄👁️
                    link
                    fedilink
                    11 year ago

                    why everything gotta be an argument, sometimes it’s just fun to say your opinion like you would talking to someone in person. Wonder what it is about text chat that kind of changes the dynamic

        • @gobbling871
          link
          01 year ago

          Nope. GP explicitly mentioned security experts that Fedora employs and other security stuff that Fedora apparently has an advantage on over other distros. I wonder if they knew in particular what these advantages are because that got me curious.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            Read their comment again. The first paragraph is about privacy and Ubuntu is only mentioned at that point. Fedora’s default security is only compared to nix and arch.

            • @gobbling871
              link
              01 year ago

              I used Ubuntu as an example for argument’s sake not as a defence for Ubuntu’s privacy/security features.