• NeuromancerOPM
    link
    fedilink
    -129 months ago

    I think the 2nd amendment was poorly written. I’ve read on it extensively and I don’t think it conveys the idea behind it. I think since the courts have further muddled the topic.

    Be careful with modern interpretations. I assume you are a liberal which means you’d hate heller. Heller is a modern view the 2nd amendment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      You mean, you have an idea in your head that you think should be enforced on everybody despite it not being democratically placed.

      The word for that is fascist. And it just so happens to be the right to deadly violence lmao.

      Irony is dead.

      • NeuromancerOPM
        link
        fedilink
        -139 months ago

        That makes little sense. Can you expand? Democratically placed sounds like you don’t get out government.

        We are a constitutional republic. Not everything is voted on. It’s what protects our rights. Otherwise things like gay marriage could be illegal by a vote or trans people could be voted out. With the constitution they are protected from the tyranny of the majority.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          89 months ago

          And none of that applies to thoughts living in your head. You want to enforce your beliefs on everybody without any government process.

          Those beliefs is in regards to your right to deadly violence.

          You are a violent fascist who uses linguistics on democracy and constitutional republic to dismiss the violence you are advocating.

          • NeuromancerOPM
            link
            fedilink
            -109 months ago

            What are you rambling about? You are making no sense.

            Can you be more clear what thoughts you are referencing ?

            I outlined the government process.

            And what violence am I advocating ? I have advocated for no violence.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              79 months ago

              I recommend you read the thread if you are confused about the discussion.

              We weren’t discussing a political process. We were discussing your headcannon of the 2nd amendment and how it aligns perfectly with the stance of a violent fascist.

              • NeuromancerOPM
                link
                fedilink
                -99 months ago

                The law is now violent fascist? lol. You’re making no sense.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  7
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  I think the 2nd amendment was poorly written. I’ve read on it extensively and I don’t think it conveys the idea behind it. I think since the courts have further muddled the topic.

                  THE LAW

                  Lmao did you bring the rest of the circus with you?

                  Repeating “you’re making no sense” is a poor form of coping since you can’t address things people actually said.

                  • NeuromancerOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -109 months ago

                    Do you think the 2nd amendment conveys the right for a citizen to own a firearm without any ties to a militia ?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      79 months ago

      be careful with modern interpretations

      Man, I can’t get over you flip-flopping right here.

      You literally chimed in to insist upon a modern interpretation, then immediately said nobody else should do so.

      Conservatives are inherently incapable of honest debate.