@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agoexamdiscuss.tchncs.deimagemessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up1331arrow-down13
arrow-up1328arrow-down1imageexamdiscuss.tchncs.de@[email protected] to [email protected] • 1 year agomessage-square11fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•1 year agoWith how gravity isn’t a force in general relativity meaning Newton’s formula isn’t technically correct in a general sense makes it funny Coulomb’s “copied” formula turned out to be the correct one.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink5•1 year agoIsn’t general relativity just a way to interpret reality instead of what reality is? I mean, just a very accurate model of reality. But anything can be anything in any model, which is cool as long as the model has some kind of utility. (?) Or, are we accepting that objectively gravity is definetely not a force?
With how gravity isn’t a force in general relativity meaning Newton’s formula isn’t technically correct in a general sense makes it funny Coulomb’s “copied” formula turned out to be the correct one.
Isn’t general relativity just a way to interpret reality instead of what reality is?
I mean, just a very accurate model of reality. But anything can be anything in any model, which is cool as long as the model has some kind of utility.
(?)
Or, are we accepting that objectively gravity is definetely not a force?