• BarqsHasBite
    link
    fedilink
    English
    59 months ago

    See you have to keep drifting from EVs and F150s, fucking lol. Remember that was your first hole. Besides trying to effectively ignore, well, all my examples (because yes I am familiar with the concrete trucks used in residential construction). And driveways were covered with moving trucks and furniture trucks (fully loaded of course). Ok I really can’t keep correcting you all day. Cheers.

    • @SchmidtGenetics
      link
      -109 months ago

      You can’t correct me since you are entirely mistaken and wrong lmfao.

      Its weight distribution, the overall weight is a portion of the calculation. Theres a reason why larger vehicles have more larger tires dude…

      It’s okay to be wrong, the NHTSA has some wonderful information for you.

      • BarqsHasBite
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        FYI it’s actually axle weight (that’s taken to the 4th power), that you don’t even know that while trying to present yourself as an authority says it all. Feel free to look it up. But you can’t spread it out enough over 3 to 4 to 5 axles to equal consumer vehicles. Not even close, and then the 4th power. That’s why consumer vehicles are not even a rounding error. Ok that’s it, really. Cheers.

        • @SchmidtGenetics
          link
          -6
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          For asphalt… for concrete it’s psi, which changes on the amount of tires per axle….

          Driveways are typically concrete and roads are typically asphalt. You’re arguing different angles and points:

          You’re conflating the two. It happens. This is why you should stick to one argument instead of trying to bring others in to make your point. You just conflate shit lol, there’s a reason why it’s considered a fallacy to do it.