• Owen
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    @ajsadauskas @heatofignition @mondoman712

    Right, it sounds like we’re mostly on the same page. If you scroll back up and read my original reply, I’m pushing back on multiple people communicating a hard line in the sand, no additional car ownership costs before there’s some vague level of transit service.

    That is a lot different than asking our policymakers to coordinate transportation changes, which you seem to be saying now. Here’s the original post:

    https://lemmy.world/comment/8058778

      • Owen
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        @ajsadauskas @heatofignition @mondoman712

        Its an important distinction because people have a delusional perception of what’s already available. Every city has a bus system. People can use 20 minute bus service! And I guarantee if middle class folks start riding those buses, the service will improve.

        And additionally there are places that will never have transit. We can’t hope people will eventually just stop living in rural areas and then after that, finally, we’ll raise fuel taxes.

        • AJ Sadauskas
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          @owen @heatofignition @mondoman712 I think we’re broadly on the same page. It’s definitely not a hard line in the sand at my end.

          I tend to view transport and urban planning policy as being deeply connected. There’s a number of tools in that policy toolkit that should ideally be used together to reduce car dependency. And pricing is one of them.

          And I get the impression that for a number of pragmatic reasons, there might be some differences in what good policy looks like in the US versus Australia.

          As an aside, country areas are an interesting side case. I think in many country areas, it is possible to get much better services than currently exist, but that’s a different discussion.