• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    99 months ago

    I agree, except with the first sentence.

    1. I don’t think a computer program has passed the Turing test without interpreting the rules in a very lax way and heavily stacking the deck in the bot’s favor.
    2. I’d be impressed if a machine does something hard even if the machine is specifically designed to do that. Something like proving the Riemann hypothesis or actually passing an honest version of Turing test.
    • Tar_Alcaran
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 months ago

      The Turing test doesn’t say any of that. Which is why it was first passed in the 60s, and is a bad test.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        Any of… what?

        Yea I don’t think the Turing test is that great for establishing genuine artificial intelligence, but I also maintain that current state of the art doesn’t even pass the Turing test to an intellectually honest standard and certainly didn’t in the 60s.