• @aeronmelon
    link
    English
    7
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Even Mark Gurman can’t resist click bait.

    Epic talking to Apple and agreeing to follow the rules in order to get their developer account back is not Apple “reversing course.” It’s Epic correcting their mistake.

      • @aeronmelon
        link
        English
        -29 months ago

        points to the tweets pictured

        I don’t subscribe to Bloomberg, but I can only assume he’s talking about it there, too, if tweets don’t count.

        Moral of the story: Don’t tell (or even imply) to one of the most powerful companies in the world that you don’t intend to abide by an upcoming rule change, even if you’re certain you’re right.

        Thankfully, Apple’s crap proposal is still just a proposal.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          69 months ago

          The tweet didn’t make any sense to me since it didn’t seem like a developer whining about your policies was ban worthy. It sounds like Epic hadn’t actually broken any rules yet.

          EU regulators must feel like they’re babysitting two spoiled brats.

          • @aeronmelon
            link
            English
            29 months ago

            EU regulators must feel like they’re babysitting two spoiled brats.

            We are in complete agreement there.

        • @xkforce
          link
          English
          39 months ago

          Calling apple’s response in the EU “hot garbage” does not equate to “we are not following your rules” unless I am missing something

    • Ender of Games
      link
      fedilink
      English
      79 months ago

      Reposting from above:

      Epic agreed to follow the rules before the ban, not the other way around. In fact, the email cited was February 23rd, over two weeks ago.

      Apple 100% made the move in bad faith, and are saving face with “we decided to unban them because they agreed to follow the rules”.