He is an evil individual who fails to address systemic issues or assist people for their own benefit.

As a game show host, he humiliates and exploits participants, boasting about his own virtues without any regard for the contestants.

Examples:

I believe legal intervention is necessary to limit his actions towards people and prevent him from exploiting them for personal gain.

Quick note: while I believe that results of some of his videos is good ( which he did to show how good of a person he is), that does not change the facts about his evil videos, the same way bezoz donations does not make him a good person.

  • @[email protected]
    2•9 months ago

    This is a hop skip and a jump from “the more you feed the homeless at a soup kitchen, the less they went to go out and get a job”

    Edit for clarity: I’m not espousing that opinion, I’m targeting it.

    Huh? We should feed the homeless, and we should encourage philanthropy.

    Separately, we should improve our governmental systems.

    Edit edit

    Im specifically targeting the line about government not doing its job.

    Corporate fuckery is not philanthropy, and the implication that charity diminishes governmental progress is a source I’d like to read.

      • @[email protected]
        7•9 months ago

        Huh? We should feed the homeless, and we should encourage philanthropy.

        Separately, we should improve our governmental systems.

        I’d like a source of charity bring a net detriment to social progress.

        Edit Elon’s Hyperloop is not philanthropy charity or anything near it.

        Equating what mr beast does to the regularity and systemic fuckery Elon does is inaccurate