• @pixxelkick
    link
    16
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Men work more overtime, take on more risks, and are more willing to put themselves in danger.

    Men get paid more, because they are willing to pay the extra pound of flesh it demands, because they have a bit more flesh to offer. Men have higher average stamina, physical strength, and physical resilience.

    I won’t necessarily say that’s a good thing, but it’s a fact. There’s a reason all the dangerous jobs are male dominated, but simultaneously men die on the job or get severely maimed substantially more.

    Interestingly enough if you look at a woman dominated industry that is extremely dangerous abd demands a pound of flesh (like prostitution) suddenly the gender gap flips heavily the other way.

    As I always say, you don’t see people talking about gender disparity of garbage truck drivers and other areas of the sanitation industry, even though there’s a lot of disparity over there.

    Why aren’t people complaining about the lack of women in the sanitation industry? Weird, huh?

      • @pixxelkick
        link
        32 months ago

        Anecdotal warning: From my experience going tk a gandful of schools in western canada… inner city schools bias towards women dimishes due to higher risk conditions. The gender ratio shifts as you go from nicer well funded schools to inner city poorer neighborhoods.

        The higher risk schools tend to have way more men teaching as well as male cops walking around, whereas the gentrified safer schools tend to be women dominated.

        It still leand towards women, but the lean evens out a lot more as risk/danger goes up, as well as pay.

        You also see more male teachers if you go way up to far northern schools that have much harsher conditions, where governments trade to provide monetary incentives in return for roughing it up on way more secluded places.

        So, nope, from what I’ve seen the pattern holds just as much in teaching.