• @TIMMAY
    link
    English
    619 months ago

    I just watched CGP Grey’s video about state flags yesterday

      • @TIMMAY
        link
        English
        129 months ago

        Lol he stuck to his “no name on the flag” rule but I recall him saying it was decent. Im from IL so I cant complain about bad flags

        • @SirMcCheese
          link
          English
          49 months ago

          He did say no names or words and Colorado’s flag has a letter on it. I would argue that doesn’t fall within the criteria he laid out but oh well.

          • @TIMMAY
            link
            English
            39 months ago

            I see it as C and O which is the shorthand name for the state 🤷‍♂️

      • ...m...
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        …i mean, if rwanda’s 1962 flag didn’t give you a case of the giggles, i guess colorado’s alright…

      • TheHarpyEagle
        link
        English
        99 months ago

        Now I will admit that I’m a CGP Grey fan and thus biased, but I do think this rebuttal does feel more contrarian than reasoned.

        He mentions the historical use of flags was for easy recognition at sea and in war and thus not really needed by established land-locked colonies, but I’d argue recognizability is still the main purpose of flags. I’d actually argue it’s more important now since we see so many more flags in our lifetime than anyone did 200 years ago. How often do you see states listed by or next to their flags now? Take this Wikipedia article on state populations. Do you need the flags to identify each state? Of course not. But they do enforce instant recognition of the state and make it easier to find the state you care about at a glance (so long as the state has a distinct flag).

        Beyond that, he mentions the historical meaning of seals, but that need not be lost by a flag redesign. Take the proposal for the Keystone Flag, which reuses the colors of the seal while adding new meaning via symbolism. Both can be used as conversation points to teach about the history of the state, while the latter gains the benefit of being visually distinct.

        He also mentions that the point of seals was to be visually intricate not because of the history they represent, but for security purposes. Why, then, do we need what is basically a watermark on our flag? Does it trump the desire for a visually appealing and meaningful flag just because it’s old?

        As a final point, Grey has a practical reason for desiring distinct flags: he uses them to visually represent states and countries in his videos. His preference, biased as it may be by his own needs, is not arbitrarily decided.

        • AbsentBird
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          “more contrarian than reasoned” is like J.J.'s brand.

        • Bob
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19 months ago

          I, on the other hand, am biased against CGP Grey, but I take your point that he didn’t arbitrarily arrive at his opinion. I do find the seals visually distinct myself but I can see it the other way.

      • @TIMMAY
        link
        English
        19 months ago

        oh man I forgot about JJ for a bit there