Where did I say or imply “the person making bold claims doesn’t need to provide any evidence of those claims”.
Right here:
They locked their twitter account. So internet archive is your friend.
OP made them vaguest of all claims (“SBI leadership said awful things”) and I simply asked them for specifics and a link. You know, to “provide any evidence for those claims.”
Your reply to me was basically “look it up yourself”, which is not how the burden of proof works.
Lmao. I’m losing braincells here lol.
Some of you behave so chronically online. Get a life.
How did I imply it? Can you also reference where I refer to OP. I replied cause op’s comment was posted 2 days ago and it was clear they weren’t going to reply.
This is just a misunderstanding in my opinion. So let me make it clear that I’m not on op’s side. I don’t care if sweet abby inc is in a game I play. I do care about Kotaku tho. I have a hard time believing their stories.
I only called you chronically online because you have at least 50 comments on this topic in 2 days.
So I’ll end the conversation here. Idk why it was even dragged on this long.
I only called you chronically online because you have at least 50 comments on this topic in 2 days.
I only called you chronically online because you’re laughing like a lunatic every other sentence, and apparently going into my profile and counting each individual comment I’ve made on a given topic. That’s not the behaviour of someone who touches grass.
That’s not what chronically online means. It’s the internet , people say “LMAO” a lot. Scrolling a profile for 5 sec thread is not that hard and 50 is a guess. You seem quite troubled using the internet. You don’t need to take everything here to face value. I get the feeling that you don’t know when to stop so I’m just gonna block you for now.
I swear people don’t understand the burden of proof and you’re one of them
Lmao. I’m losing braincells here lol. Where did I say or imply “the person making bold claims doesn’t need to provide any evidence of those claims”.
My only intention was to help you find those tweets if you were interested. Some of you behave so chronically online. Get a life.
Right here:
OP made them vaguest of all claims (“SBI leadership said awful things”) and I simply asked them for specifics and a link. You know, to “provide any evidence for those claims.”
Your reply to me was basically “look it up yourself”, which is not how the burden of proof works.
It’s always projection…
How did I imply it? Can you also reference where I refer to OP. I replied cause op’s comment was posted 2 days ago and it was clear they weren’t going to reply.
This is just a misunderstanding in my opinion. So let me make it clear that I’m not on op’s side. I don’t care if sweet abby inc is in a game I play. I do care about Kotaku tho. I have a hard time believing their stories.
I only called you chronically online because you have at least 50 comments on this topic in 2 days.
So I’ll end the conversation here. Idk why it was even dragged on this long.
I only called you chronically online because you’re laughing like a lunatic every other sentence, and apparently going into my profile and counting each individual comment I’ve made on a given topic. That’s not the behaviour of someone who touches grass.
That’s not what chronically online means. It’s the internet , people say “LMAO” a lot. Scrolling a profile for 5 sec thread is not that hard and 50 is a guess. You seem quite troubled using the internet. You don’t need to take everything here to face value. I get the feeling that you don’t know when to stop so I’m just gonna block you for now.
Says the person who’s being going at this just as long and needs to announce his leaving, twice, instead of just leaving.