• @krashmo
    link
    17
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I’m not sure why the sex of the ancient person who did it, matters.

    Make that a common sentiment and a good chunk of the division surrounding modern discourse goes away. People care way too much about genitals both in the past and present.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      78 months ago

      Not only what your genitalia is, but what you do with it, seems to be a top priority for far too many people. They’re not your genitals, so maybe don’t worry about it?

      But “God” or something. I don’t know.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38 months ago

        I didn’t take it as a correction. More of a clarification. I omitted some extraneous detail that they added. I felt it was implied well enough by context that it didn’t need to be said, obviously they wanted to add more clarity to the statement.

        In my mind the two statements are identical, except that mine relies on context and theirs is a bit more explicit in what is said.

      • @krashmo
        link
        08 months ago

        I don’t think that’s phrased as a correction. It clearly wasn’t as you noted

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          “clearly wasn’t”

          I see now, you just phrase things abruptly in a way that SEEMS rude but clearly isn’t. My mistake. Have a nice day.

          • @krashmo
            link
            -18 months ago

            You figured out what it meant. That’s clear enough for communication purposes imo. You’re welcome to your own interpretation though