• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    On the second paragraph: Chinese shit is still really cheap. It just did pay off. As did replacing the accounting clerks of a decade earlier than that with computer spreadsheets.

    • @just_another_person
      link
      English
      -17 months ago

      The manufacturing sector goes even further to proving my point. The same rhetoric of “We’re only moving a small portion of manufacturing to China so we can invest more in our workforce here…” was a common line in the 80’s, and 100% bullshit and lies as well. The intent was always to increase profits to the detriment of the human workforce they didn’t give a single shit about.

      Any person who buys into all the speeches about replacing human positions with X for the greater good of the existing workers is either naive, foolish, or in on the scam to begin with.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        27 months ago

        Employment rates aren’t looking all that different, though. They’re still a few percent from perfect.

        Obviously it’s bad for the specific workers replaced, but the general concept of innovation being good is backed by a lot of hard numbers.

        • @just_another_person
          link
          English
          17 months ago

          They haven’t even started all the plans they keep announcing. The point is, they are saying they aim to REPLACE humans with AI. Nobody should be so fucking naive to think they mean to hire humans back in support of this somehow. That’s just idiotic.