• @radix
      link
      English
      5710 months ago

      Because that’s the way they’ve done it since 1987, and the CEO doesn’t like change.

      • wolfkin
        link
        fedilink
        3610 months ago

        @radix @gregorum I can just FEEL how super useful that was many many years ago. How utterly brilliant everyone felt when they got it working. How depressed they must feel to know it’s still going.

    • @Thrashy
      link
      English
      2910 months ago

      Not OP, but if I had to hazard a guess, it started as a rudimentary issue tracker and grew into a formalized system over time, maybe? I’ve worked with many a project manager who “knew Excel” and liked to use it for things it should never be used for, and sometimes PMs get promoted and take their dumb little systems up the org chart with them.

    • @Wrench
      link
      English
      2210 months ago

      Bypassing communication archiving requirements? Years ago, I worked for a company that logged all IM, etc, that occurred in a companies intranet. There were laws that required all communications to be preserved for certain industries.

      This sounds like a workaround to avoid chat history

      • @NewNewAccount
        link
        English
        1710 months ago

        Generally bypassing these auditing requirements is a punishable offense. I worked for a firm that was SEC regulated and you might be shocked at how much effort was expended on ensuring these policies weren’t being circumvented.

      • dantheclammanOP
        link
        English
        410 months ago

        “We cracked the case open when we discovered their chats in ‘troubleshooting_not_secret_comms.xls’. They tried to cover their tracks through regular deletion, and they would have gotten away with it if not for one neglected PC in a disused office running an unsupervised copy of Norton Backup 1990.”