• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    207 months ago

    They’ll just blame the voters, like they already do.

    The Dems have invested everything into Biden so they can’t change their ship, and the stans can’t admit there is any flaws, so it must be everyone else that is wrong.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      137 months ago

      I don’t know where you guys see it, but I never see any stans for Biden who can’t admit his flaws like we see with Trump supporters. The only support I see for Biden is for the general election, not for him or his policies overall. I only see people being critical of Biden but saying we need to vote for him anyway. As bad as it is, there is no Palestine with Trump, there’s possibly no democracy with Trump, there’s only likely a lot of suffering for the regular people with Trump.

      • @[email protected]OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I see it everywhere. I’d name drop but can’t “attack the user” in this community or whatever the rule is.

        It’s almost at maga levels with these people. Any criticism of Biden is met with “Why do you want Trump to win”, “Bidens policies have been so good but no one knows about them”, or “The president can’t just do things”. I always see zero willingness to admit his huge flaws and only deflection.

        • @APassenger
          link
          English
          27 months ago

          Sometimes we hold our nose and vote. Because the alternative is so deeply problematic our moral judgement of one is dwarfed by the moral and practical horror of the other.

          • @Maggoty
            link
            English
            47 months ago

            We did that already.

          • @Linkerbaan
            link
            English
            07 months ago

            Because literal Genocide isn’t “deeply problematic”.

            • @APassenger
              link
              English
              27 months ago

              It would be happening in more places, more aggressively with a President Trump.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Sometimes we don’t make excuses for enabling genocide, but I guess that moral and practical horror is a-okay to some.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              37 months ago

              Not voting against Trump is enabling even more genocide and the end of some women and minority rights so don’t pretend like you’ve got the moral high ground if your refuse to vote because of the Democrats stance on Israel.

              • @Maalus
                link
                English
                37 months ago

                They absolutely have the moral highground. Fuck a president that enables genocide and funds it. Saying “oh don’t be a single issue voter!” when the issue is “stop mass killings of people with a single phone call” is so out of this world, it’s just insane.

                Time for a third party, plain and simple.

                • @agitatedpotato
                  link
                  English
                  37 months ago

                  If literal genocide cannot convince liberals to consider third parties, then I’m convinced they will never support third parties. This is the duopolies Sandy Hook moment. If you see Genocide A or Genocide B and don’t seek a third option, you will never seek a third option.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Sure but that third party doesn’t exist so you knowingly letting an even worse option win thus enabling even more genocide just shows you didn’t really care about genocides in the first place

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          Ok, those aren’t the same thing as supporting him. I will admit I don’t care for his policies, but they have been better than I expected, which is something. Also, yeah the president doesn’t have the power to do that much alone. It requires congress to play a role, which the democrats don’t have enough control in to do. Those are extremely valid things to say, and you can say them while still being critical of Biden. It sounds like you want people to only be critical of him, which is just as bad as only supporting him. We need to understand there’s more beyond the one man or we will fail.

          • @[email protected]OP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            I’m sorry, but defending someone from criticism and saying their policies are super amazing isn’t supporting them?

            • Cethin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 months ago

              Saying they’re amazing is, but that’s not what you said they said.

              Defending can be, but it isn’t necessarily. I’ll defend a lot of people or things that people are attacking for no reason. That said, defending someone from a legitimate critique is usually done out of support, but still sometimes it’s done out of a feeling of necessity.

      • @Maggoty
        link
        English
        37 months ago

        I’ve seen it all over the place. Usually in the form of the narcissist’s prayer too.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      107 months ago

      Well, trump was the best thing to happen to democratic fundraising ever. So. They have an incentive to see him win.

      • @agitatedpotato
        link
        English
        57 months ago

        Media ratings too. Every single outlet that plays on TV would love a Trump victory because it makes people pay attention who would otherwise not watch any news.