You are deflecting again. Show me were that list promises to be an exhaustive authority on every ethnicity. Even if you were to do that doesn’t address that actual issue. You provided a link with criteria for an ethnicity. If you actually read the criteria and ask does this criteria apply to lgbtq people you get several yes answers. I backed up my statement with direct quotes from your own link. You have been trying to deflect and distract from that and it’s both obvious and pathetic. Use your link and show that none of those criteria apply to lgbtq.
No, you are not acting in good faith. It does not apply. You seem to think it does but it doesn’t. It is not backed up by definition or any group using the word as you claim. This is an you issue and not an issue with me.
This is a you problem. I’ve politely to find something that agrees with you and you can’t. That’s because what you are saying isn’t true. I’ve given you several documents and you’ve provided nothing.
I’ve politely shown you that your own link agrees with me and you, in bad faith ever since, have avoided addressing the content of your link. You have not given me several documents, you have given two links one which I showed said the opposite of your point and one which I showed was not relevant. Stating it as several documents is a weak rhetorical tactic to try and make you sound like you have performed better than you have and is in reality just a lie.
Use the first two sentences of your link and explain how none of the criteria applies. You won’t. You are dishonest and the engaging in bad faith. I really do hope it’s some sad pride that makes you dig in on this topic.
If there is a problem with me then it’s that I call out bad faith arguments. Like yours.
This is the final time I am stating this. This is your problem. You have provided nothing but a misunderstanding on the topic. You have provided zero documents to back your claim. When challenged about that, you double down on the claim but again can’t cite any group that agrees with you. If this is true as you claim, you should be able to provide some documentation to cite your claim, but you can’t. Could that be because you are wrong? That is the obvious answer and that answer I am going to take since otherwise it would be easy to back your claim.
You have provided nothing but a misunderstanding on the topic. You have provided zero documents to back your claim.
I provided you with a quote from the first two sentences of the same document that you supplied. Do you need me to post the exact same link in order for it to count in your mind?
I provided you that quote and then narrowed it down stating exactly which parts applied. You have never once addressed that. You tried to introduce a requirement of other external documents. I don’t need to provide other documents or usage cases because the link you provided sets the criteria. I asked you a question about that link. You have been avoiding that link ever since.
I don’t think you are even tracking what you are saying.
What is my claim?
My problem is dishonest people. I can keep saying that.
Here is a list of ethnic groups.
Can you show me where trans people or homosexuals are in the list?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_contemporary_ethnic_groups
I’m not irrational. You just are clueless and refuse to backup your clueless claim.
You are deflecting again. Show me were that list promises to be an exhaustive authority on every ethnicity. Even if you were to do that doesn’t address that actual issue. You provided a link with criteria for an ethnicity. If you actually read the criteria and ask does this criteria apply to lgbtq people you get several yes answers. I backed up my statement with direct quotes from your own link. You have been trying to deflect and distract from that and it’s both obvious and pathetic. Use your link and show that none of those criteria apply to lgbtq.
No, you are not acting in good faith. It does not apply. You seem to think it does but it doesn’t. It is not backed up by definition or any group using the word as you claim. This is an you issue and not an issue with me.
What does not apply? The quote from your own link does not apply
This is a you problem. I’ve politely to find something that agrees with you and you can’t. That’s because what you are saying isn’t true. I’ve given you several documents and you’ve provided nothing.
As I said this is a you problem.
I’ve politely shown you that your own link agrees with me and you, in bad faith ever since, have avoided addressing the content of your link. You have not given me several documents, you have given two links one which I showed said the opposite of your point and one which I showed was not relevant. Stating it as several documents is a weak rhetorical tactic to try and make you sound like you have performed better than you have and is in reality just a lie.
Use the first two sentences of your link and explain how none of the criteria applies. You won’t. You are dishonest and the engaging in bad faith. I really do hope it’s some sad pride that makes you dig in on this topic.
If there is a problem with me then it’s that I call out bad faith arguments. Like yours.
This is the final time I am stating this. This is your problem. You have provided nothing but a misunderstanding on the topic. You have provided zero documents to back your claim. When challenged about that, you double down on the claim but again can’t cite any group that agrees with you. If this is true as you claim, you should be able to provide some documentation to cite your claim, but you can’t. Could that be because you are wrong? That is the obvious answer and that answer I am going to take since otherwise it would be easy to back your claim.
I provided you with a quote from the first two sentences of the same document that you supplied. Do you need me to post the exact same link in order for it to count in your mind?
I provided you that quote and then narrowed it down stating exactly which parts applied. You have never once addressed that. You tried to introduce a requirement of other external documents. I don’t need to provide other documents or usage cases because the link you provided sets the criteria. I asked you a question about that link. You have been avoiding that link ever since.
I don’t think you are even tracking what you are saying.
What is my claim?
My problem is dishonest people. I can keep saying that.