Hey there! I’m new to paper MTG and play Commander with my playgroup. We’ve been having a debate about whether the total value of a deck really indicates how strong it is. One of my friends argues that value doesn’t equal strength, but I can’t help but wonder when I keep losing to a deck with a higher price tag than mine.

I’ve been playing 1v1 games with my friend for a few months now, so I know their deck almost as well as mine. It can be frustrating when I can predict their moves but still can’t win with my basic deck. I understand the point that a couple of expensive cards in a deck won’t guarantee a win, but when a deck is upgraded with so many pricey cards, it feels like a whole different ball game.

For reference, we both started with precons, and both upgraded. I spent $20, they spent $120+. Inputing my deck list in a deck value calculator returns $103, which is lower than their upgrade alone lol

I don’t mind losing when the match is good. I hate losing when I’m always on the backfoot and can’t do much besides hoping to survive another turn

What are your thoughts on this? I’d love to hear different perspectives on the relationship between deck value and strength in the game.

edit: I received more responses than I expected, so I’ll need some time to go through them all and respond. Thank you in advance!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    38 months ago

    1v1 is a different kettle of fish, and rewards aggro strategies that generally won’t get there in 4 way EDH.

    Mana bases matter more in 1v1 as well and good lands are not cheap.

    However, powerful cards are also rarely cheap cards. It’s not 1-1, but a higher price tag tends towards more powerful in a vacuum.

    Willingness to spend more might also correlate with greater investment/familiarity with TCGs, and thus better heuristics in how to play too, though.