@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-21 year agoPhytagorasfile.coffeeimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1951arrow-down131
arrow-up1920arrow-down1imagePhytagorasfile.coffee@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-21 year agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-square@Huschkelink3•1 year agoBut then the two on the bottom would have to be inside one another.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•1 year agoKinky. But no, not necessarily. You could say that one of them is the actual person and the other “person” is just the first person’s shadow. It’s a stretch, but it’s the best I’ve got.
But then the two on the bottom would have to be inside one another.
Its an awkward position but it is possible
Kinky. But no, not necessarily. You could say that one of them is the actual person and the other “person” is just the first person’s shadow. It’s a stretch, but it’s the best I’ve got.