@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-210 months agoPhytagorasfile.coffeeimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1951arrow-down131
arrow-up1920arrow-down1imagePhytagorasfile.coffee@[email protected] to [email protected] • edit-210 months agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-square@Huschkelink3•10 months agoBut then the two on the bottom would have to be inside one another.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink8•10 months agoKinky. But no, not necessarily. You could say that one of them is the actual person and the other “person” is just the first person’s shadow. It’s a stretch, but it’s the best I’ve got.
But then the two on the bottom would have to be inside one another.
Its an awkward position but it is possible
Kinky. But no, not necessarily. You could say that one of them is the actual person and the other “person” is just the first person’s shadow. It’s a stretch, but it’s the best I’ve got.