The statute, which can lead to reproductive coercion in a state that has banned abortion, has recently gained nationwide attention

The statute, which can lead to reproductive coercion in a state that has banned abortion, has recently gained nationwide attention

At six months pregnant, H decided enough was enough. She had endured years of abuse from her husband and had recently discovered he was also physically violent towards her child. She contacted an attorney to help her get a divorce.

But she was stopped short. Her lawyer told her that she could not finalize a divorce in Missouri because she was pregnant. “I just absolutely felt defeated,” she said. H returned to the house she shared with her abuser, sleeping in her child’s room on the floor and continuing to face violence. On the night before she gave birth, she slept in the most secure room in the house: on the tile floor in the basement, with the family’s dogs.

Under a Missouri statute that has recently gained nationwide attention, every petitioner for divorce is required to disclose their pregnancy status. In practice, experts say, those who are pregnant are barred from legally dissolving their marriage. “The application [of the law] is an outright ban,” said Danielle Drake, attorney at Parks & Drake. When Drake learned her then husband was having an affair, her own divorce stalled because she was pregnant. Two other states have similar laws: Texas and Arkansas.

  • @gedaliyahM
    11•9 months ago

    Divorce opens up legal options. She may not be able to legally move out of state for example.

    • @yamanii
      0•9 months ago

      I’m sure there are plenty of couples where people live separately for a period time because of work, how can the law prevent someone from just moving?

      • @ProfessorProteusEnglish
        11•9 months ago

        Five minutes ago I would have asked how a law can possibly ban divorce during a pregnancy. Never ever give Republicans the benefit of the doubt.

          • @ProfessorProteusEnglish
            2•9 months ago

            I feel like I got a little heated, but that wasn’t intended to be directed at you. Stay safe, wherever you live 🙂

      • @[email protected]English
        7•9 months ago

        Inability to separate finances/custody arrangements for current children. Ability for your spouse to make medical decisions for you.

        Remember, we’re talking about people who are already at risk of violence.

      • @[email protected]
        6•9 months ago

        Because pressure can be applied if you are not divorced, through kids, through money, through property laws, etc. If you take the kids with you and move away, is it kidnapping? Are you going to take that chance of the abuser finding a sympathetic cop in one of these states? Property is usually considered communal in marriage, so if the abuser takes the car it isn’t ‘theft.’ What if the abuser takes the dog and has it put down? Even if the abuser had to travel to where you are, had to take the dog by sneaking into the house you’re living in now, and had to take the dog to a vet who was out of the area so they didn’t know the abuser (and thus what they were doing), it wouldn’t be breaking the law because the dog is technically both of the married individuals’ property. You can’t prevent the abuser from picking up the kids from their school. The list goes on.

        Think of a way an abuser can twist the thumbscrews, and if there is not a divorce, and thus complete legal separation, the law (and I mean the legal rules, not cops by that) either shields them or ignores the issue when they are twisting down. By the by, none of these scenarios are made up. I’ve seen each one during my brief time working with families that have abusers.