- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
The statute, which can lead to reproductive coercion in a state that has banned abortion, has recently gained nationwide attention
At six months pregnant, H decided enough was enough. She had endured years of abuse from her husband and had recently discovered he was also physically violent towards her child. She contacted an attorney to help her get a divorce.
But she was stopped short. Her lawyer told her that she could not finalize a divorce in Missouri because she was pregnant. “I just absolutely felt defeated,” she said. H returned to the house she shared with her abuser, sleeping in her child’s room on the floor and continuing to face violence. On the night before she gave birth, she slept in the most secure room in the house: on the tile floor in the basement, with the family’s dogs.
Under a Missouri statute that has recently gained nationwide attention, every petitioner for divorce is required to disclose their pregnancy status. In practice, experts say, those who are pregnant are barred from legally dissolving their marriage. “The application [of the law] is an outright ban,” said Danielle Drake, attorney at Parks & Drake. When Drake learned her then husband was having an affair, her own divorce stalled because she was pregnant. Two other states have similar laws: Texas and Arkansas.
Yes they were.
Only their neighbours cared and they are dwarfed by the power of Rome. It’s akin to Iran and North Korea’s attempts to dethrone the US
Han, Maya, Bantu weren’t doing much to them
Sure, but ten neighbors effectively allied against you while you also keep making unforced errors is still a problem. If you want to say they weren’t really empires, fair enough, but they were being constantly tested politically.
Of course, Best Rome handled it for another thousand years, against actual empires, mostly by not inventing racism.
Byzantine best Rome?
East Rome indeed Best Rome. The numbers speak for themselves.