• @Madison420
    link
    139 months ago

    That’s the point boss. These people call themselves patriots and say what is in the word bubbles, the folks in the boat were actual patriots and wouldn’t say that. They’re literally pointing out the cognitive dissonance of what these idiots say and what they believe themselves to be.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -6
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      But the “Patriots” of today could just directly be portrayed as confederates without any dissonant subcontext. Why sully a cool painting for a meme

      • @Madison420
        link
        39 months ago

        It’s a bullshit painting based largely on myth and misunderstanding of history. The dudes on that boat were ready to kill Washington and Washington had a simple choice, lead a fight or die by his men’s hands and hope they don’t have the wish to kill him afterwards or that there wouldn’t be enough of them left to matter.

          • @Madison420
            link
            19 months ago

            It doesn’t change the fact that it’s just early propaganda.

              • @Madison420
                link
                19 months ago

                Whitewashed bud, not dramatized.

                If I stub my toe and say my foot is ruined I’m being dramatic, if I say I’m a war hero when in reality my military career is mostly huge flops then I’m just a liar.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago
                  1. No one actually thinks the depicted crossing happened that way, with the top officer of the army leading the charge in a rowboat. My choice of the word dramatized implied it is fictional in it’s specifics. Hell that’s not even the Delaware depicted.

                  2. Washington was not a “war hero” per se, and indeed had some big losses. But to suggest his military career was “mostly huge flops” is silly. He is roundly regarded as a highly successful general and strategist with an acknowledged average tactical record. On the balance there’s no way you can call him a flop general.

                  There are really good books on this topic that strongly investigate his career and are not fluff/charity pieces.

                  • @Madison420
                    link
                    19 months ago

                    His plans were mostly flops often succeeding dispite himself and only through lower officers with actual competency. Re: the whiskey rebellion to see how badly Washington can fuck things up when left to his own devices.

                    Von stuben is a hero and largely responsible for Washingtons success and American victory generally.