@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 8 months agoWell that sucksfedia.ioimagemessage-square152fedilinkarrow-up1901arrow-down121
arrow-up1880arrow-down1imageWell that sucksfedia.io@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 8 months agomessage-square152fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-20•8 months agoSo if children are at a strip club the government should not intervene?
minus-square@Olhonestjimlink21•edit-28 months agoKids have never been allowed in strip clubs. You’re using a slippery slope argument.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-14•8 months agoUh, not thats not a slippery slope argument… Its an argument about how if there are things happening then we should stop them, even if you think its authortarian. So if we were able stop children looking at naked people, then we should do that too.
minus-square@Olhonestjimlink13•8 months agoChildren already are not allowed in strip clubs, and never have been. You are employing a slippery slope argument.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink-15•8 months agoGotcha, you dont know what a slippery slope argument is, and can understand a basic argument. Have a great night!
minus-square@Olhonestjimlink12•8 months agoAnd you don’t have the courage to consider a viewpoint other than your own. Goodbye.
So if children are at a strip club the government should not intervene?
Kids have never been allowed in strip clubs. You’re using a slippery slope argument.
Uh, not thats not a slippery slope argument… Its an argument about how if there are things happening then we should stop them, even if you think its authortarian. So if we were able stop children looking at naked people, then we should do that too.
Children already are not allowed in strip clubs, and never have been. You are employing a slippery slope argument.
Gotcha, you dont know what a slippery slope argument is, and can understand a basic argument. Have a great night!
And you don’t have the courage to consider a viewpoint other than your own. Goodbye.