• TheHarpyEagle
    link
    English
    19 months ago

    I don’t feel confident about that. The bill has two elements of wide appeal: 1) General distrust of China and 2) General dislike of TikTok. At least from what I’ve seen, very little attention has been paid to the privacy/data collection part of the bill outside of tech-saavy circles. I feel like GDPR would’ve been the much larger push for data privacy, but it has lost its novelty and nothing has changed on this side of the pond. Hell, even Cambridge Analytica hardly sparked any lasting changes.

    • @Duamerthrax
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      1.I don’t trust China.

      1. I don’t trust Tiktok or like ultra short form media.

      So cool, cool.

      I really don’t have a horse in this race. Politics is a spectators sport and I’m just coasting until climate change makes this all moot.

      • TheHarpyEagle
        link
        English
        29 months ago

        My point wasn’t really that you shouldn’t care about those things, just that I don’t think this bill will make any difference when it comes to increasing data privacy protections. In the “best case” (by government standards), TikTok will still be around. It’ll just be operated by a US company, and those have not exactly been known to be responsible with user data.

        The biggest concern even for people who hate TikTok is the broad wording of the bill that possibly restricts using a VPN to access said banned sites. It’s a very dangerous precedent to set and is a much bigger part of the opposition than any particular love of TikTok.