• @Telodzrum
    link
    109 months ago

    Arrests and convictions are not a valid proxy for violent acts or crimes committed. If you knew absolutely anything about this area of study you’d be aware of that. Have fun with your willful ignorance.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      09 months ago

      Crime victimization survey is, and can be used in conjunction with crime justice system statistics.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -19 months ago

        Thanks for being reasonably-minded.

        If nothing else, I’m finding discussions like these helpful in curating my Lemmy experience. If someone is spreading misinformation, ignoring evidence to the contrary, and refuses to provide an argument as to why they feel the way to do, even if it’s only a rationalization, then it’s clear they’re not (yet) capable of debate with critical thought and without emotions and social conditioning blinding them. I’ve never been one to block people but Lemmy is infested with groupthink in a way I’d never thought possible, it’s beyond reddit.

        Also any snark is highly frowned upon, unless it’s in favor of the groupthink, so that’s my own fault.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          29 months ago

          Yeah, this place can be kind of particular. I tend to stay quiet on shit I don’t align with 100%. This is just something that’s well studied with good data. If people refuse to accept reality we can’t really fix shit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -3
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      So the victims say the perpetrator is a white man; police arrest black male. I’ll wait for you to link to the 4 times that’s happened as if it’s a checkmate.

      I’m sure you have the added statistics for convictions and they fully support what you’re saying. Pray tell, because your urban vs. rural assumptions on violence is clearly not supported by the evidence.

      Convictions show the same? Curious about your reasoning for that, that doesn’t sound wildly racist.

      If we’re not going off of facts (statics of arrests and convictions) then what are we going off of? Feelings? I’m more than willing to have my mind changed if you can provide an argument that rural white men are the most dangerous group, as long as it’s based on more than feelings and hearsay. A black man in urban attire walking into a sunset town of 100 people has the same result as a white man in a suit walking down a dangerous inner-city street. Same cause of effect: human nature.

      At the risk of sounding racist, I think it’s quite obvious that when you buy a foreign people from their homeland as a commodity (sold largely in part by warlords and warring tribes of the same race, by the way), treat them as chattle (literally) and forbid any written or oral history of their culture or familial past, while raping the women and killing the babies or selling them off, creating extreme intergenerational trauma, hatred, and injustice, and then continue treating them like shit even after the law says you can no longer treat them as less than human…

      You may have a societal problem on your hands that doesn’t resolve itself in a measly few generations. A societal problem that results in higher rates of violence.

      We need better support in this country in so many aspects. For women and men of all races and creeds. But until we break away from being an overly materialistic consumerist society, that won’t change. What we don’t need is a distortion of reality to fit a false narrative.