• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    169 months ago

    Federal government workers in the US generally have a “base salary,” which stays the same across all regions, so you can easily compare. And then they get a regional adjustment, based on where they actually live, called “locality pay.” I think this is recalculated annually based on the specific areas. It’s almost certainly more complicated than that, but I think that’s the gist.

    I agree with you, and my point is that the US government already does this! So if it’s fine for government workers, just apply that same algorithm to a federal minimum wage, peg it with some inflation index, and we’ve solved made the minimum wage issue a whole lot better, so we can focus on other issues that don’t have huge supermajorities of support.

    • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 months ago

      That’s kinda why I suggested the average rent as an index, since unless we do some Nordic style price adjustment control that limits how much prices can go up in a year or such, that will probably be the best indicator of the actual inflation that the average consumer is experiencing in any given year.

        • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          How about whichever is higher? I feel like circumstances could lead to either causing wages to be lower than they would be if pegged to the other instead.

          • @mynameisigglepiggle
            link
            English
            29 months ago

            If some clown wants to charge $3B for rent in a hovel in the backstreets of Idaho, mean rent might not make a lot of sense.