• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -44
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    To be fair Ukraine have said they intend to fight until the borders are back to pre-war which includes Crimea.

    Compromise can be met with Crimea.

    Edit: can someone who downvotes explain why you disagree?

    • @Windex007
      link
      298 months ago

      Crimea WAS the compromise. In 2014. The orange revolution was the compromise in 2004.

      The disagreement is with the idea that compromise would even result in a real peace. The Russia would stop actively working to dismantle the Ukrainian state. It’s not even just Ukraine. Georgia was invaded in 2008.

      At this point, it’s just appeasement. And appeasement doesn’t work.

    • @PugJesusOP
      link
      English
      29
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      About the only bit that could be compromised on. Crimea isn’t going to be retaken by an invasion force, unless the whole Russian military collapses in on itself.

      However, I would note that effectively sieging Crimea is very viable considering the poor state of the Russian Navy in the Black Sea and Crimea’s reliance on supply from the rest of Russia. However, that would require most Ukrainian land taken during the initial invasion to be reclaimed first.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        138 months ago

        A properly supplied Ukraine could probably manage all that singlehandedly given what weve seen.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Yep most definitely, reclaiming the mainland is step one and no compromises should be made there. The decision on the remaining bloodshed and cost required to retake crimea from 2014 annexation can be evaluated at that point.