While Eva Burch spoke on the Senate floor about her planned abortion, almost all of her GOP colleagues found something else to do

  • KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    248 months ago

    cant wait until someone proposes a gun ban, on the precedent of the abortion ban. Will be a funny day.

    • @aidan
      link
      38 months ago

      But that doesn’t really make sense, there is no federal law about abortion, the constitution protects gun ownership.ax

      • KillingTimeItself
        link
        fedilink
        English
        78 months ago

        yeah, that’s my point.

        There was a federal law about abortion. We dont have it anymore.

        • @aidan
          link
          18 months ago

          Except it was written nowhere near as explicitly.

          • KillingTimeItself
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            idk man it was pretty explicit, considering the fact that the second it was removed, legislation went into place in order to ban it on a state level. Seems pretty explicit to me.

            • @aidan
              link
              18 months ago

              Wdym? The SCOTUS ruling was explicit, the constitution never mentioned it though.

              • KillingTimeItself
                link
                fedilink
                English
                18 months ago

                yeah, idk if you noticed, but generally, theres this pretty cool thing about the US government where its really fucking bloated, and so anything can come from anywhere. It’s not like amendments are set in stone either. I mean slavery would be a thing still otherwise, and women wouldn’t have rights.

      • @MJKee9
        link
        38 months ago

        Technically, both gun ownership rights and abortion rights were based on supreme Court interpretation of the 2nd and 14th amendments (respectively). Given the reversal of the right to abortion under the 14th amendment, an argument could be made that a similar reversal is due for the 2nd amendment as well. The 2nd amendment could simply be interpreted to mean that gun ownership is only a right as part of a "well regulated militia.'. In my opinion, that is the plain meaning of the provision anyway, but I’m just a gun toting liberal that doesn’t get sexually aroused or validated by the size of my firearm.

        • Ann Archy
          link
          18 months ago

          I’m with you my man, but you’re speaking to a bunch of 17-year old furry tumblerinas in here, you need to take that into consideration.