• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    18 months ago

    🤷‍♂️ I’m not about to send the message that people can come to my house and take my shit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -118 months ago

      Yeah but it should be conditional imo. If they’re armed or you have suspicion they could be armed, then kill them. Otherwise, maybe aim for the leg or shoulder?

      • @PugJesusOP
        link
        English
        158 months ago

        If you’re shooting, shoot to kill. There’s not a non-lethal place to shoot a human being.

        But yeah, jumping straight to the gun might be a bit much for some guy rummaging through your living room drawer. Russia is more like a hardened criminal who’s been threatening you every night for the past month busting down your door and beating your kid to death.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -5
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Humans very regularly survive gunshots. About twice as many people are injured by gunshots as those who die from them each year in the USA, even when suicides are included. My philosophy is to minimize harm and suffering whenever possible, even at risk to myself.

          But yeh Fuck Russia.

          • @Passerby6497
            link
            English
            58 months ago

            Surviving a gunshot does not mean that you were not shot in a place that could have been fatal. You’re literally describing Survivorship Bias

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -28 months ago

              You were going to kill them regardless, why tf do you care if the other places you shoot them have a chance of fatality? Minimizing harm is all about reducing chances of undue death or suffering.