• qaz
    link
    -8
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    ARM is a type of RISCV, it makes sense their ARM division expands to other RISCV architectures.

    EDIT: ARM is a type of RISC, not RISCV

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      147 months ago

      No it’s not. Arm is a RISC architecture. RISC-V also is a RISC architecture.

      Arm is explicitly not RISC-V.

      • qaz
        link
        2
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Yes, I somehow wrote RISC-V instead of RISC 😅. You’re right.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      47 months ago

      With all the liberty to do some research before commenting, I’m rather disappointed to see such factually wrong comment.

      • qaz
        link
        06 months ago

        I did, I just accidentally wrote RISCV instead of RISC. The acronym ARM actually stands for “Acorn RISC Machine”. TheLowSpecGamer has an interesting animated series about it’s development that is worth checking out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I can see where this came from. ARM and RISC-V are both reduced instruction set computer (RISC) architechtures but are not the same. Arm is a proprietary ISA originally from Acorn. Risc-v is a new ISA developed completely open-source

      EDIT: also, not to be killjoy, but for clarity “research arm” means apendage or division and is completely unrelated

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        37 months ago

        I disagree. The simplest and best reading is they have an ARM CPU for research, and the CPU produced the RISC-V design.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          16 months ago

          Maybe we’re reading something different, or this is tongue and cheek but "Alibaba’s research arm, the Damo Academy, " sounds like research arm is a synonym for “research division” or “research department”.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  16 months ago

                  No, I was hoping it’d be confirmed when I mentiomed it could be tongue in cheek. Doesn’t always come across in a thread where some are unironically making the same point.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    36 months ago

                    I was trying to criticize the original poster by using increasingly ridiculous arguments, when it was obvious they never actually read the article and even misread the post. Something something satire.

                    I guess it didn’t come off obvious enough. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯