• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    21 year ago

    What if it requires 1/1000th the number of animals … but each one suffers a hundred times more?

    Would it be worth it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        If you don’t have a way of quantifying suffering, perhaps all utilitarian calculus is bunk?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Unfortunately, I don’t really understand your response.

          You talked about one hundred times the suffering. What does that mean? To me, the way animals are held in mass production is completely unethical and there is no way to make it worse… So how do you make the animals suffer even more?

    • @mojofrododojo
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      stem cells can suffer? this isn’t cloning an animal, it’s cloning certain tissues.

    • @nickiwest
      link
      English
      51 year ago

      From a utilitarian perspective, you’re still reducing overall suffering by an order of magnitude, so your scenario is still a greater good.