Basically, if all I can read is a headline how can I consider it informative? A news headline has as much evidence as your average Tweet, and can be deeply incorrect through the use of clickbait.

I do use methods to get around paywalls, but knowing that some/most people won’t, it seems counter-informative to solely use the clickbait headline to keep people informed.

  • @Just_Pizza_CrustOP
    link
    9
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I hadn’t considered the second part, but couldn’t bundling the source with the bypass solve that issue?

    Being that news communities are there to facilitate discussion, it seems counterproductive to keep people from viewing the article in question. If someone just wanted to read the headlines and not have any discussion, an RSS feed would probably be better.

    • Admiral PatrickM
      link
      fedilink
      188 months ago

      I always prefer the archive link in the post body. That way you have the benefit of it if you need it, and the source for the headline is prominently displayed close by.

      • @Just_Pizza_CrustOP
        link
        58 months ago

        With the archive link posted in the body, that’s not really a paywall anymore. I do appreciate you doing that though!