r/ph talks about the dog being contaminated after death the news agency seem to have omitted that specific wording. Apparently the test was done after 5 days. Also the test once done on the body not the brain which usually what is done on dogs suspected of rabies. Either way I feel like the guy who killed the dog needs to be responsible still. Even more now that the slaughter house which the dog was brought in contained rabies which is possibly going to be consumed by unsuspecting people.
If the dog was properly innoculated — as in has the full 6-in-1 and his annual checkups — it’s virtually impossible for rabies to exist in his body. The antibodies will kill it right on the spot. So whether he got it in the “slaughter house” or wherever, in the first place, Killua shouldn’t have the disease. Or maybe the test results are wrong… then again it was PAWS who published it and it goes against their narrative of the tanod being a crazed dog-killing machine.
The tanod will be charged because, in the end, he did kill a dog, and by law that’s illegal. But he does have a very compelling case as to why he did it. Some of the CCTV footage supports his argument. Killua can be seen bothering a panicky bystander and the tanod chased after it as he had a duty to protect.
IMHO it’s a terrible tragedy that should be hashed out and chalked up to bad circumstances. But if we absolutely must point fingers, I think the owners deserve blame as much as the tanod.
Edit: The dog owner gave an interview last night. Sila lang daw nagiinject ng vaccines ni Killua. Da fuck? Hahahahahaha. Also on the same video, a medical director affirmed that it’s impossible for a dead dog to contract rabies.
Edit 2: May KJMS episode pa pala which is even more damning towards Team Killua. Not only did it show that the dog charged and bit an old lady but yung so-called evidence na “tumatakbo palayo” si Killua was actually him chasing after a cat. Nung nagtagpo na sila ulit nung tanod sumusugod pa rin kahit may pamalo.
r/ph talks about the dog being contaminated after death the news agency seem to have omitted that specific wording. Apparently the test was done after 5 days. Also the test once done on the body not the brain which usually what is done on dogs suspected of rabies. Either way I feel like the guy who killed the dog needs to be responsible still. Even more now that the slaughter house which the dog was brought in contained rabies which is possibly going to be consumed by unsuspecting people.
If the dog was properly innoculated — as in has the full 6-in-1 and his annual checkups — it’s virtually impossible for rabies to exist in his body. The antibodies will kill it right on the spot. So whether he got it in the “slaughter house” or wherever, in the first place, Killua shouldn’t have the disease. Or maybe the test results are wrong… then again it was PAWS who published it and it goes against their narrative of the tanod being a crazed dog-killing machine.
The tanod will be charged because, in the end, he did kill a dog, and by law that’s illegal. But he does have a very compelling case as to why he did it. Some of the CCTV footage supports his argument. Killua can be seen bothering a panicky bystander and the tanod chased after it as he had a duty to protect.
IMHO it’s a terrible tragedy that should be hashed out and chalked up to bad circumstances. But if we absolutely must point fingers, I think the owners deserve blame as much as the tanod.
Edit: The dog owner gave an interview last night. Sila lang daw nagiinject ng vaccines ni Killua. Da fuck? Hahahahahaha. Also on the same video, a medical director affirmed that it’s impossible for a dead dog to contract rabies.
Edit 2: May KJMS episode pa pala which is even more damning towards Team Killua. Not only did it show that the dog charged and bit an old lady but yung so-called evidence na “tumatakbo palayo” si Killua was actually him chasing after a cat. Nung nagtagpo na sila ulit nung tanod sumusugod pa rin kahit may pamalo.