Both are legislative bodies, so I’m curious about how they structurally differ.

  • @doublejay1999
    link
    19 months ago

    The Lords are not elected , for starters. They are hereditary peers (aristocracy whose ancestors did favours for William the Conqueror). Or political appointments.

    Funny huh ?

    • @kescusayOPM
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      I’d heard something like that, but I didn’t know it was actually hereditary! That’s ridiculous. Is there a good reason to maintain such a system?

      • @doublejay1999
        link
        29 months ago

        I guess it’s a very effective subversion of representative democracy. !

      • @Lemming421
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        We look at the American system where both houses are elected and how that has just turned politics into even more of a popularity contest.

        On the one hand, the entire concept of a hereditary aristocracy is anti-democratic.

        On the other, I think the theory is a hereditary position is supposed to be able to think further ahead and be less influenced by populism.