I’m getting really tired of trying to run away from big tech, only to be ensnared again by the greed and/or naivety of sites who ultimately cave to the whims of big tech.

Mastodon has already caved, and the silence of lemmy’s and kbin’s developers over this matter isn’t exactly reassuring. Since I more or less still have my bags packed from leaving reddit, what are some other communities I could try that would be more resilient to corporate encroachment?

  • @Ensign_Crab
    link
    201 year ago

    So Meta’s plan is to make a twitter-alike that spies on its users and manipulates them into being the hate fueled engagement engine, and then inflict that on the fediverse?

    What’s to stop everyone from pointing out as often as possible that users can still talk to Zuck’s twits without the spying and manipulation by simply doing so from a non-Meta instance, and then defederating Meta once they are no longer dominant?

    Am I just misunderstanding this?

    • 0xtero
      link
      fedilink
      301 year ago

      So Meta’s plan is to make a twitter-alike that spies on its users and manipulates them into being the hate fueled engagement engine, and then inflict that on the fediverse?

      No one outside their boardroom knows what Meta’s plan is, but I doubt they care much about fedi. They are trying to kill off Twitter and take that marketshare of ~500M users. The fediverse with a total of 9M users (and no advertising revenue) isn’t very important in that scheme.

      They are in deep legal trouble with EU privacy regulations and need to show to EU they are “taking things seriously”. ActivityPub was most likely a nice “freebie” they can use and point out they offer interoperability. The whole fediverse bit is just to escape further GDPR trouble with EU.

      What’s to stop everyone from pointing out as often as possible that users can still talk to Zuck’s twits without the spying and manipulation by simply doing so from a non-Meta instance, and then defederating Meta once they are no longer dominant?

      I’m not sure I understand what you mean? That people would migrate away from Threads if they knew they only knew can access their followers from somewhere else? Why on earth would that ever happen? The opposite is more likely.

      Am I just misunderstanding this?

      Yes?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        71 year ago

        That’s an interesting angle that I completely failed to notice. I thought this whole experiment is for Facebook/Meta to get a headstart in a new tech space, like they’re been trying to do with VR and the whole crypto craze.

        While I never assumed their intentions were pure with any of this, I clearly was not nearly as cynical as one has to be with these people.

      • @Ensign_Crab
        link
        11 year ago

        I’m not sure I understand what you mean? That people would migrate away from Threads if they knew they only knew can access their followers from somewhere else? Why on earth would that ever happen?

        I mean, that’s what happened when people left myspace for facebook. Facebook provided tools that let them use facebook while still communicating with myspace users until enough people switched and myspace became irrelevant. Myspace’s dominance was unassailable until it wasn’t.

    • bioemerl
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      What’s to stop everyone from pointing out as often as possible that users can still talk to Zuck’s twits without the spying and manipulation by simply doing so from a non-Meta instance

      Facebook users are stupid, network effects ensure that most people go to a single provider and then minor incompatibilities between threads and the fediverse slowly cuts off the fediverse and ensures it dies.

        • bioemerl
          link
          fedilink
          91 year ago

          Dies means activity slows to the point that the site isn’t worth using. It’s not dead right now for example. I have people to talk to.

          • Aesthesiaphilia
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Or worse, Facebook forks activitypub and then once most domains are on the forked version they kill it. Or make it part of their walled garden.

            • UnhappyCamper
              link
              fedilink
              61 year ago

              I’m hoping the large majority of people here on the fediverse are here because they prefer an outlet away from soul sucking corps like Meta and won’t want to touch their forked version.

      • BraveSirZaphod
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Ah yes, I’m sure talking about how stupid the average person is what we need to do in order to promote the Fediverse as a positive and welcoming platform.

        “Join Kbin! We think you’re an idiot!”

    • WalrusDragonOnABike
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      Given the fediverse is pretty open by design, meta doesn’t even need to be part of it to spy if they wanted. It’s the EEE strategy that people are more worried about.

      • @Ensign_Crab
        link
        21 year ago

        Given the fediverse is pretty open by design, meta doesn’t even need to be part of it to spy if they wanted.

        They can’t gather all the same information that they could from a phone app, and we’ve seen what permissions they ask for on that. They also can’t manipulate the feed to drive engagement by fostering hate like they can with their own site/app.

        It’s the EEE strategy that people are more worried about.

        Hence the “get them off meta and onto other instances and then defederate” thing.