• @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          38 months ago

          That is what I thought they meant.

          Tracking the keyboard like they said would be extremely invasive and extremely illegal.

          Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

          (And yes some local tracking is needed to predict words but that’s very different from collecting data)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            38 months ago

            Let’s be real for a moment, when has legality stopped Google?

            I’m not saying you’re wrong, but until relatively recently countries have not been holding Google or other big tech companies to task beyond a measily small percentage of their annual revenue

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              38 months ago

              beyond a measily small percentage of their annual revenue

              If you are referring to the GDPR you should know that the penalty is actually really high. And it’s not like they can’t continue issuing fines if they don’t stop.

              Also you have to keep the PR impact in mind. Proved tracking of keyboard input like that would be very concerning for even the people that say “I have nothing to hide”.

              Google also doesn’t need to track that when they know everything else about our life’s.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                18 months ago

                Actually no, my statement “until recently” was referring to GDPR. I think GDPR is amazing and I’m glad we have it even if I’m an American.

                The rest of your statement is fairly factual. The only point I could consider is someone would have to prove the keyboard is tracking us which unless someone at Google wants to whistleblower isn’t the easiest task. Whistleblowers have their own issues to content with.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  18 months ago

                  Then what were you referring to when you said fines based on annual revenue?

                  I can’t recall any law that fines based on that except the GDPR and similar EU laws but for non privacy related stuff.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    18 months ago

                    As a general amount they were fined rather than any true letter of the law amount of a fine thing.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            08 months ago

            In evaluation of threats, that standard is way too high. The possibility is real even if unlikely. Unlikely things happen daily we just can’t predict which ones, because they’re each unlikely.