• @NOT_RICK
      link
      English
      336 months ago

      They’re worried about advertisers getting upset over the content and pulling out

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -146 months ago

        Oh nooo the advertisers… As if they gave a shit. They should care about who else is advertising on the platforms they advertise on.

        But i get why streaming something on your ass isn’t suitable for Twitch, have read the article by now.

        • @Evotech
          link
          English
          96 months ago

          They care a lot

    • slazer2au
      link
      English
      146 months ago

      Advertisers.

      If you were a bank or a energy company would you want your advert on potentially sexual content, and I use that in looses possible sense.

      It stems for an incident years ago where a “journalist” spam refreshed a ISIS video on YouTube until they saw a VW advert and they ran a massive story about VW financing ISIS via YouTube. I may get getting some details wrong about the story.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        36 months ago

        I don’t get such “journalists” advertisers should worry more about who else is advertising on said platforms…

        Having double ads, one Bank ad and one literal scam crypto ad right behind each other doesn’t seem good, way more so than not caring about the content itself so much.

    • @A_Very_Big_Fan
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Tons of kids use their platform, so sexualized content, even lightly sexualized content like this, is sorta questionable.

      Also advertisers.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -36 months ago

        Yeah but those kids get literal scam and porn ads very often and the normal advertisers advertise alongside those same scam and porn ads…

        • @A_Very_Big_Fan
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          That hasn’t been my experience at all. I feel like you don’t actually use Twitch, but even if you’re right it’s “tu quoque”. Neither party should be showing sexualized content in a space largely occupied by children.

            • @A_Very_Big_Fan
              link
              English
              16 months ago

              I said spaces largely occupied by children shouldn’t host sexualized content. It’s telling that you have an issue with that.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -36 months ago

                The internet is “largely occupied by children”

                Nah man. The parents of said children are 100% responsible for them and have to oversee their internet activity in general.

                Censoring everything because “the children!!!” is literally antidemocratic and a great way to censor and spy on everyone.

                I have an issue with “do it for the children” mentality as the same mentality is used to press chat control and more censorship on everyone.

                Its either for children or against terrorism that costs the internet more and more privacy and rights.

                • @A_Very_Big_Fan
                  link
                  English
                  06 months ago

                  literally antidemocratic

                  Twitch isn’t a state-owned company. 🤷‍♀️ The only vote they care about is the advertiser’s.

                  If you think it’s appropriate to allow sexualized content on a streaming service centered around a hobby dominated by children, make your own.