• Admiral Patrick
    link
    fedilink
    English
    73
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Majority of People: I want a pony.

    Candidate 1: I’m going to kill all the ponies.

    Candidate 2: I won’t do that, and will try to make ponies more affordable (because price-fixing the cost of ponies is not within my constitutional powers)

    Leftist: “But that’s not good enough! I want a free pony. And a blowjob. I’m voting 3rd party 😤”

    • @lennybird
      link
      English
      74
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Do keep in mind these aggressive purist Gatekeeping / no true Scot leftists are very often just right-wing astroturfers. It hits two birds with one stone: they make leftism obnoxious, they often muddy the waters of violence, and wedge-drive the Democratic coalition to get Trump elected.

      Either that or they’re very young and naive.

      Don’t fall for it. You’ll see more of this the closer the election gets.

      • Admiral Patrick
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Oh, I’m not fooled (for the most part, anyway). I’m just giving the benefit of doubt and calling them out using their own arguments and trying to not make any assumptions or accusations.

        • @lennybird
          link
          English
          18
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          The problem is they don’t often argue in good faith. Usually deflection and gish-gallop are their MO. So be concise and be mindful of the bystander audience.

          • Admiral Patrick
            link
            fedilink
            English
            109 months ago

            Oh, for sure. I never argue to change their minds, just to shut down whatever narrative they’re trying to spin for the bystander audience. I’ll usually play along with the gish-galloping as long as time allows but usually stop when they transition into sealioning.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        129 months ago

        Spot fucking on, but its that second group, the young and naive that make these points worth arguing and harping on about. Sometimes those of us whove been online our whole lives forget the indoctrinating power of the internet. Shit, thats what pushed me further and further left, and still does to this day.

        And ur last sentence… oof… i know… brace yourselves, and kick up the counterefforts.

        • @lennybird
          link
          English
          69 months ago

          Great point - I don’t mean to disparage those newcomers to politics. We’ve all been there of course.

          I guess I gate-kept a bit there myself, and my apologies for that.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            No no no! I didn’t take it that way at all, just wanted to add the clarification i figured u left out.

            I figured if u were gatekeeping against youth u wouldnt have even bothered to comment at all. Sorry if i sounded like i was putting down ur point for it, u were saying something i think we all could hear more on this platform. Esp as the tankies pretend that the presence of bad faith actors on lemmy trying to hand the election to sr. Racismo via non-voting/third party voting is not existent.

            • @lennybird
              link
              English
              29 months ago

              Comments like this give me hope friend. Keep fighting the good fight :)

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                29 months ago

                I feel like i dispense a lot of thank yous and encouragement to everyone else to keep it up. It feels nice to be on the receiving end so randomly. Thanks dude. Made me smile, for real <3

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                19 months ago

                Aight im back to say, im rereading this thread and some of ur other comments above (about astroturfing leading the young esp) go so hard.

                So me fight the good fight? You, you sir keep fighting the good fight. As in the present tense. As in u have been. Dont stop.

                Solidarity to u and all other leftist speakers and activists seeking change by whichever means they know how…

                Just leave some in the bank for when election season is upon us…

                • @lennybird
                  link
                  English
                  29 months ago

                  Aw thanks and likewise — comments like yours really help to shatter all the depression and gaslighting that gets spread and restores some semblance of sanity :)

                  And don’t worry about losing steam! I’m amped up for the election year and will only continue to ramp it up! I have frankly too many ideas to enhance my personal impact on the election and need to get better organized lol.

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    19 months ago

                    Please do.

                    For all the “Russian Shill” tags i dispense with on here, urs is one of the first im tagging as “Comrade.”

                    Its time to start thinking about collecting ourselves on this platform to fight against the misinformation, gaslighting, and just outright foreign interference we see here. We owe to the newcomers for this platform to not just be a hive of, “voting is genocide 😱.”

                    I want solidarity. Solidarity between anyone leftward leaning. If a righty has a leftist idea, it must be backed. If status quo joe wants to reunite even one family separated at the border, we should back the notion.

            • Sybil
              link
              -29 months ago

              the tankies pretend that the presence of bad faith actors on lemmy trying to hand the election to sr. Racismo via non-voting/third party voting is not existent.

              if it existed, why haven’t you ever produced any evidence of it?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                39 months ago

                Bc im not wasting my time on yall. Im not going to participate in what will either turn into a gush gallop or gaslighting. Uve got it in this thread. U got it all over hexbear and .ml.

                Thanks for caring enough to follow tho 🥰

                • Sybil
                  link
                  -19 months ago

                  a claim made without evidence can be dismissed without evidence, and no one should believe your claims unless you support them.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -209 months ago

        i don’t believe you can prove anyone (not everyone, just one person) who doesn’t think biden is good enough is either right wing or “young and naive”

        • @lennybird
          link
          English
          259 months ago

          No but I can prove they’re short-sighted; and those two things go hand-in-hand. In my experience I’ve frankly yet to see someone older than like 22-years-old espouse such self-defeating beliefs and goals.

          I can also prove that right-wing extremists engage in political astroturfing routinely and that according to investigative reporting these far-right groups intend to muddy the waters.

          Taken from there, it takes very little ink (inductive reasoning) to connect the dots.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -119 months ago

            can prove they’re short-sighted;

            how? what methodology is available to you to prove such an accusation?

            • @lennybird
              link
              English
              17
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              EDIT: Observe the user below spamming multiple replies to the same comment. This is part of the gaslighting gish-gallop tactic I’ve noted. There is a user here I suspect of having many alt accounts and who frequently does this. I encourage you to report them for spam.

              what methodology is available to you to prove such an accusation?

              If I may, a thing called logic.

              • If your goal is to minimize genocide, both in Palestine and Ukraine.
              • If your goal is to ensure that we don’t fall further into fascism.
              • If the choices on the ballot in November are a constant, regardless of anything else that happens.
              • If you understand the nature of entropy in that maintaining let alone building-upon a trillion-piece puzzle is exceedingly more taxing than smashing it.
              • If other guy is significantly-worse for Ukrainians, Palestinians, US, and the World.
              • If you understand the mathematical trend of FPTP and the Spoiler Effect.

              … Then one understands the logical choice is voting for Biden and doing anything else from not voting, voting Republican, voting 3rd-party, writing-in – is utterly self-defeating and short-sighted to the aforementioned goals.

              If you don’t understand these things, then yes, one might have built their ardent beliefs atop a house of cards.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -159 months ago

            Taken from there, it takes very little ink (inductive reasoning) to connect the dots.

            this isn’t proof. it’s innuendo.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      269 months ago

      3rd party: “I can make big promises willy nilly because there is zero chance I’ll win and therefore won’t be held accountable”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      149 months ago

      The leftist in this comment also makes sure to plug their ears nice and good if u tell them that the first candidate is financed by foreign powers literally hostile to anything u hold dear, a situation beyond unprecedented.

      Voting is the least u can do politically, but it is still praxis, and absolutely necessary given the circumstances.

    • @OccamsTeapot
      link
      59 months ago

      Candidate 1: I will keep giving guns to the people killing ponies but I will feel bad about it and criticize them sometimes

      Candidate 2: I will give the guns and not feel bad.

      Leftist: hey can anyone just, you know, not help people kill ponies?

      Centrist: omg I can’t believe you’re asking for so much from your candidates. Your ideological purity is the real enemy here. I bet you don’t even care about ponies

        • @OccamsTeapot
          link
          8
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Haha yeah a very nuanced and realistic portrayal of leftists. Obviously we just want free ponies and blowjobs. Preventing geno-what? Never heard of it

          Edit. Star Trek profile pic? Remember when the federation gave weapons and aid to the dominion because it was politically convenient and the cardassians are worse anyway? No neither do I.

          • Admiral Patrick
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -5
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Haha yeah a very nuanced and realistic portrayal of leftists. Obviously we just want free ponies and blowjobs. Preventing geno-what? Never heard of it

            Edit. Star Trek profile pic? Remember when the federation gave weapons and aid to the dominion because it was politically convenient and the cardassians are worse anyway? No neither do I.

            For a second there, I was willing to accept you might be arguing in good faith, but the personal attack you felt the need to tack on destroyed that benefit of doubt and my willingness to continue in debate.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              99 months ago

              There was no personal attack there.

              Have you ever talked to someone irl? If so, did you do it without crying?

            • @OccamsTeapot
              link
              79 months ago

              I am arguing in good faith, obviously. There was no personal attack. I’m sure you draw some distinction between pure morals (as in trek) and “real life” but I genuinely do not see how this is defensible. I’m sure you’re a nice person

        • @hark
          link
          29 months ago

          Mmmm, I absolutely love that centrist condescension, “sweetie”.

    • @Emerald
      link
      -19 months ago

      Real strange way to make a point

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -24
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Candidate 2: I’m going to give guns and money to the person killing ponies but tell them they shouldn’t do it.

      Leftist: Either way ponies are going to be killed. Let’s try something different.

      Centrist: Noooo, you have to vote for the proxy pony killer who can’t use his position to do anything or else you’ll get a pony killer in power who’ll use his position to do everything.

      • PugJesus
        link
        fedilink
        309 months ago

        Leftist: Either way ponies are going to be killed. Let’s try something different.

        “Something different” here meaning “handing over the position to the worse of the two options”.

              • Hyperreality
                link
                fedilink
                15
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                You’re getting stabbed whatever happens.

                Would you rather get stabbed in the finger or stabbed in the eye?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -29 months ago

                  The third option is to reject the United States and replace it with something that isn’t an oligarchy

                  • Hyperreality
                    link
                    fedilink
                    12
                    edit-2
                    9 months ago

                    There aren’t. There are only two possible outcomes.

                    Stabbed in the finger or stabbed in the eye?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    109 months ago

                    Have fun losing more rights instead of compromising on Biden becsuse he isn’t 100% perfect.

                  • PugJesus
                    link
                    fedilink
                    109 months ago

                    There is always other options, you just have to take them.

                    lmao

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            8
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Do y’all just, sincerely not understand what “lesser evil” means? Yes, the lesser evil is still bad. We know. That’s what “evil” means. Both options suck, one sucks measurably more, so you choose the one that is less bad.

            None of these “Both sides!” Leftists ever seem to offer specific or workable alternatives. It’s always something vague like “Have our voices be heard, take back the country from the oligarchs!” And I feel that, but like, how? What specific candidate or action is going to prevent both from winning?

      • @fishos
        link
        English
        59 months ago

        You said it so perfectly and I never realized it. “If you elect our guy, he won’t be able to do anything, but at least it’s better than if you elect the other guy. If you elect the other guy, somehow he’ll be able to do everything he wants. But vote for our impotent guy instead. It’s safe!”

        Um what?

        • @candybrie
          link
          109 months ago

          One follows the rules, and the other often doesn’t even think there are rules. The difference there isn’t hard to suss out. It’s like that joke about playing chess with a pigeon.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            19 months ago

            I want a guy who doesn’t think there are rules, and will protect ponies. Why isn’t that a possibility

            • @candybrie
              link
              49 months ago

              Because not thinking there are rules into adulthood is a pretty self-absorbed trait, which usually doesn’t go along with things like empathy and compassion.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                39 months ago

                There aren’t rules. Trump is proof of that

                A socialist with that same attitude towards rules, norms, and civility would be the ideal option. That isn’t possible under our system. However, a fascist with those views is possible.

                And the neoliberal erosion of living standards will just make the fascists more appealing to normal people. So if the fascists don’t win in 2024 then they’ll win in the near future unless we have a massive expansion of the welfare state that helps median Americans, not just the incredibly poor

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29 months ago

        You literally can’t try something different, in this election. It’s physically impossible. Leftists should be channeling this energy to the next election, and building a viable candidate that truly meets their needs.